To Clarify…

In case anyone comes here because of false fabrications they have heard (or read) elsewhere…

  • I am not a self-proclaimed Christian, I AM a Christian!
  • I never called the other blogger “mean”, “sad” or “bitter” in any of my posts. Never used those words to describe that person at all. I did say she was in pain and asked for others to pray for her. I did relate to a story of a very rude person in my past, but never called this particular person such. (Now, what my followers post in their comments are theirs, not mine!)
  • I have not edited any of my previous posts. They are the originals from time of publishing. Nothing has since been deleted.
  • I did not intentionally take the name of someone else. When I looked, 24atHeart was available and was not (and currently is not) showing up in trademark searches. I did not look for any other variation because that is not what I wanted. Even if I had, when I was choosing my name, it would not have shown trademarked since it was filed in June of this year.
  • I have been saying I am 24 years old for a long time. Since I was 24 to be exact – thus the name! My son is 26 almost 27 so you can imagine just how many years it has been.
  • In my five years of blogging, I’ve never once run across this blog.
  • There is absolutely no reason I would want to steal from her. Her name. Her photos. Anything. Period! (Her photos are beautiful, by the way.)
  • I have never used 24atHeart for my photography name. No, not even on Google+. It had/has my photography name (which was not and is not 24atHeart. Never has been. Ever!) and my public domain address. The only reference to 24atHeart that I had on a few photos was my public domain name of 24atHeart.com (which most have now been replaced.) More false information.
  • What is being neglected to share with her followers is the fact that I stopped by her site to say “hi.” Not to stir up anything and certainly not out of any competition. It was a friendly, hello. I am even the one who pointed out to her our name similarities. She was only “informed” by me!
  • As soon as she contacted me and informed me she was trademarked (which I DID NOT realize,) I contacted my attorney (yes, Friday evening) and began removing everything just as she had requested.
  • It does matter who had a name first, according to my attorney. Contesting can take place depending on who had it “in commerce” first. “If you wish to contest her claim, there will be a stage in the trademark registering process when you will need to take a formal stand . . . That process is a several months-long process and, as I said, she filed her application recently (June). At any rate, once the USPTO issues a “notice of allowance,” there will be a posting in the Official Gazette. At that time, any “oppositions” (opposing her registration) must be filed within a 30-day window of time. That initiates a litigation matter before the trademark authority.”
  • I do not wish to contest her claim because she owns it fair and square. I’ve said that from the first post I put out. Thus the reason I began removing the name once it was brought to my attention that she owned it. I’ve had my blog since 2006 however, I have not used that name for that length of time. She had her name “in commerce” prior to mine. I just never saw it until four days ago. End of story!

Now, THIS is the truth!

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again…I just wanted to make a new friend. That is all! Now, hopefully we can put this behind and we can move on to more important things!

Advertisements

Comments make me happy!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s